Back

@Avitus I disagree. Taking this approach to an extreme would be to say that e2e-encrypted IMs should not exist at all, as this should be handled by the underlying network.

It isn't though, so we need them.

There is a valid privacy issue here, albeit not as huge as the sensational framing of "Signal deanonymized" might suggest. And there are ways for Signal to try to mitigate that.

@makdaam