ioc.exchange is one of the many independent Mastodon servers you can use to participate in the fediverse.
INDICATORS OF COMPROMISE (IOC) InfoSec Community within the Fediverse. Newbies, experts, gurus - Everyone is Welcome! Instance is supposed to be fast and secure.

Administered by:

Server stats:

1.3K
active users

But it raises a serious question I’ve never gotten a great answer to: *why* were corporations conditioning their use of Signal protocol on a license from Moxie/OWS?

Signal is a slightly over-complicated protocol but purportedly it’s an open one. Surely there’s no need for a license to use the protocol. So presumably the stumbling block here is that people feel uncomfortable using the software without Moxie/OWS/SF’s proprietary implementation?

That seems very bad to me. I’m obviously 100% in favor of protocol designers and developers earning money for good things. But “private industry literally can’t do encrypted DMs without signing a license” is a crap place for us to be.

To be clear, I understand the GPL licensing issues. Ordinarily one gets around those through re-implementation.

I am in favor of OSS and GPL but if the “cost” of the GPL is that we, as a society, don’t get privacy? Then screw the GPL and re-implement with MIT.

To be clear I posted a meme implying that this killed the encrypted DMs project. It didn’t. The licensing issues merely delayed it, which I’m sure was harmful. Twitter still deserves loads of credit for failing to implement this, all on their own.